SciTeachJC
- Last night's #SciTeachJC has now been Storified and up on the site: http://t.co/AG6Vi20cdb comments and feedback welcome. #asechat 2 weeks ago
- #SciTeachJC Thank you, and goodnight... @teachingofsci has left the building (archive/summary to follow soonish) 2 weeks ago
- #SciTeachJC oh, and thanks to @theASE for opening up access to the journal article - consider joining if you've not already! #asechat 2 weeks ago
- with that thought, I'm going to call it an evening for the 'official' part of #SciTeachJC. Thanks to all for contributing on lovely evening! 2 weeks ago
- Sounds like the answer to Q4 is a resounding YES, let's see about collecting more data then considering design. #SciTeachJC 2 weeks ago
- #SciTeachJC so to Q4: how could we collect that wider set of data, for example on this question? Is the benefit worth the effort? 2 weeks ago
- #SciTeachJC to summarise Q3: ppl like idea of trialling changes (locally or based on wider evidence) but sceptical about it happening? 2 weeks ago
-
Recent Posts
- #SciTeachJC: Discrete KS3 HSW
- Meeting Nineteen (7th May): A School’s Experience of the Discrete Teaching of Scientific Skills at Early Secondary Level
- Meeting Eighteen (16th April) The Impact of Teacher Subject Knowledge on Student Achievement: Evidence from Within-Teacher Within-Student Variation
- Meeting Seventeen (19th March) The use of ethical frameworks by students following a new science course for 16–18 year-olds
- Summary of Meeting Sixteen
Recent Comments
- Experts and experimental government | Geoff Mulgan | Education Today on About
- Experts and experimental government | Geoff Mulgan - Government Tenders, Government News and Information - Government Online on About
- The evidence based teaching bandwagon on Summary of Meeting Sixteen
- The evidence based teaching bandwagon on Archive: Meeting Six — Learning Styles
- The Evidence-Based-Teaching Bandwagon | Teaching Science on Summary of Meeting Sixteen
Archives
Categories
Meta
Author Archives: alby
Meeting thirteen (12th June): Competition and Girls
Alison Booth and Patrick Nolen, “Choosing to Compete: How Different Are Girls and Boys?”, IZA Discussion Paper No. 4027. [Download .PDF, 288 kB] Abstract: Using a controlled experiment, we examine the role of nurture in explaining the stylized fact that … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
2 Comments
Meeting Eleven (8th May): School is not where most Americans learn most of their science
John Falk and Lynn Dierking “The 95 Percent Solution: School is not where most Americans learn most of their science”, American Scientist 98: 486–493 (2010), doi: 10.1511/2010.87.486. [Download .PDF] Abstract: We contend that a major educational advantage enjoyed by the … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment
Meeting Nine — The Impact of Teacher Subject Knowledge on Student Achievement
Johannes Metzler and Ludger Woessmann “The Impact of Teacher Subject Knowledge on Student Achievement: Evidence from Within-Teacher Within-Student Variation” IZA Discussion Paper Number 4999 (2010) (.PDF link). Abstract: Teachers differ greatly in how much they teach their students, but little … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
1 Comment
Meeting Four — Test Enhanced Learning (20th September)
Please note that this paper is not science-specific. The Science Teaching Journal Club would like to invite all teachers, not just science teachers, to participate in our fourth meeting; please invite your friends and colleagues. Roediger, Henry and Jeffrey Karpicke, … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
2 Comments
Archive: Meeting Three — Driver and the fallacy of induction
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment
Meeting Three
Driver, Rosalind, “The fallacy of induction in science teaching”, in Teaching Science, ed. Ralph Levinson (London: Routledge, 1994), 41–48. (Google Books) Discussion points: Students are known to have preconceptions about how the world works. How do you deal with this … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment