Meeting Sixteen (15th January 2013): Randomised Controlled Trials in Educational Research

Happy New Year!

It’s been 6 months since our last meet­ing. Both @Alby and @AlomShaha have been unavail­able to run the club over the lat­ter half of 2012 and the autumn school term is tra­di­tion­ally a long and stress­ful term so, despite a few false starts, we’ve not been able to get things up and run­ning again. Until now.

The first meet­ing of 2013 (15th Jan­u­ary at 7:30pm) is inspired by the doc­u­men­tary on Radio 4 last week, where Ben Goldacre dis­cusses using evi­dence to inform pol­icy, con­cen­trat­ing on how suit­able ran­domised con­trolled tri­als (RCTs) might be when used in as evi­dence for social poli­cies in areas such as crime and edu­ca­tion. This pro­gramme can be down­loaded before Fri­day 11th Jan­u­ary from here http://www.bbc.co.uk/podcasts/series/r4choice. It’s not pos­si­ble for us to dis­trib­ute this pod­cast after this time as it con­tra­venes BBC pol­icy so down­load it as soon as possible.

There are some use­ful papers we could dis­cuss how­ever we suf­fer from the usual prob­lems  i.e.: a lack of open access to research papers. So for this meet­ing, we will look at the paper writ­ten for the Cab­i­net Office by Dr Ben Goldacre, Pro­fes­sor David Torg­er­son et al:

Test, Learn, Adapt: Devel­op­ing Pub­lic Pol­icy with Ran­domised Con­trolled Trials.

Haynes L., Ser­vice, O., Goldacre, B., Torg­er­son D. (2012). Test, Learn, Adapt: Devel­op­ing Pub­lic Pol­icy with Ran­domised Con­trolled Tri­als. Cab­i­net Office Behav­ioural
Insights Team
http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/resource-library/test-learn-adapt-developing-public-policy-randomised-controlled-trials [down­load .pdf]

The paper doesn’t con­cen­trate exclu­sively on RCTs in edu­ca­tional research, but there are some exam­ples within that do sug­gest that RCTs should be used to form edu­ca­tion policy.

To com­ple­ment the paper here are some other open ref­er­ence mate­ri­als that are available:

Ques­tions to dis­cuss dur­ing the meet­ing are :

1. How well would the meth­ods described in the paper work in your school? Would you con­sider run­ning or tak­ing part in a ran­domised con­trol trial in your school? Why or why not?
2. What con­cerns do you have with the eth­i­cal con­sid­er­a­tions of using RCTs in edu­ca­tional research?
3. Do you agree with Ben’s asser­tion (in the doc­u­men­tary) that RCTs pro­vide bet­ter evi­dence (“the gold stan­dard”) than other meth­ods of research for social sci­ences.
4. Which edu­ca­tional inter­ven­tion would you like to see more evi­dence for, in the form of RCTs (or other methodology)?

The meet­ing is Tues­day, 15th Jan­u­ary 2013 at 7:30pm UTC, to be mod­er­ated by @A_Weatherall. Remem­ber to use the hash­tag #sciteachjc dur­ing the discussion.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Meeting Sixteen (15th January 2013): Randomised Controlled Trials in Educational Research

  1. Stephen Pickles says:

    I am not a sci­ence teacher, so do excuse me. I used to be a uni­ver­sity librar­ian in the field, so I am very inter­ested in your com­ment about the ” usual prob­lem ” of lack of access to research papers.
    I don’t need to rehearse the argu­ments against jour­nal pub­lisher pay walls and the mer­its of open access, but would like to make sure you know of the efforts that higher edu­ca­tion librar­i­ans have made to enable their aca­d­e­mic col­leagues to make that jour­nal lit­er­a­ture avail­able to a wider audi­ence . See for exam­ple http://eprints.ioe.ac.uk where Michael Reiss and many other IOE col­leagues have posted full text of many of their pub­li­ca­tions (and still remain­ing within the con­straints of their pub­lish­ers’ poli­cies)
    Here, as a sim­ple exam­ple, is a list of full text ava­ial­able stuff with the word sci­ence in the title
    http://tinyurl.com/iOEscience

    It is of course a drop in the ocean , but bet­ter, in my view, than sim­ply hav­ing to rely on summaries/ exhor­ta­tions from experts who have decided which bits of evi­dence are good enough for those out­side the pay walls to read

    • Alex Weatherall says:

      Hi Stephen,

      First of all, you not being a sci­ence teacher cer­tainly doesn’t pre­clude you from mak­ing con­tri­bu­tions to our jour­nal club, all are wel­come; espe­cially as you have high­lighted such a use­ful resource. I can’t speak for the oth­ers, but I wasn’t aware of this par­tic­u­lar resource. Of course some pub­li­ca­tions are made avail­able, for instance the sci­ence edu­ca­tion group at Uni­ver­sity of York make a lot of their research papers avail­able http://www.york.ac.uk/education/research/research-paper/ . We just need to know where to look.

      Thank’s for your comment.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>